Political Party – Understanding The Intricacies

America is fairly unique among politically developed countries in that there are just two major parties actively engaged in getting elected and running the country. Many other countries have three or more parties vying for the inspection of their political process. Which is ‘better,’ if there’s a ‘better? ‘ We’ll leave that question for a later time. Let’s focus on our two-party system, and see if there’s room for a third person to enter the affray, and what are the odds that a third party would be successful in winning a national election.

The two major parties in the US political arena are the Democratic Party and Republican Party, as of today. Even though various other parties have achieved minor representation at the state as well as national level, it is the two major political parties which have been in control of the US Congress since 1856. Given below are the particulars of these two and other political entities in the United States as of today.

More Political Party Info!

Other political parties with an important role to play in the American politics include Libertarian Party (1971), the Constitution Party (1992), and the Green Party (1980s. ) The third largest party in the area of registered voters, the Constitution Party follows the ideology of American nationalism and National conservatism. The Libertarian Party ideology is based on libertarianism and non-interventionism, while that of the Green Party is based on green politics. Other than these, there are a number of other small parties. These don’t run for the Presidential polls, but do contest for other offices of the US administration.

You must admit it makes sense…

One definition of our two-party system that I use is,’ Two wolves and a lamb, voting on what to have for luncheon,’ and a hint I give with respect to the identities of these three entities is the people of America aren’t one of the two wolves.

Now we’re getting into it..

Going back to 1832, a gentleman under the name of William Wist, running for the chairmanship as a member of the Anti-Masonic Party, garnered 7.8% of the vote. That party disappeared after that election.

In 1912, Teddy Roosevelt, running on the Progressive Party platform, got 27.5% of the vote, which is the more in American history of any third party. The Progressive Party returned to the Republican Party for the next election.

Eighty years went by before another serious third party campaign was mounted, and this one in 1992 by H. Ross Perot, a Texas millionaire (or billionaire). Despite spending several millions of his own money, his Reform Party captured only 18.9 % Of the vote, which dropped to 8.4 percent in the 1996 election, and then disappeared.

Since Perot, no third party candidate for the chair has been able to receive more than just a bare one percent of the vote, usually less. In 2010, there are three active third parties, Green Party, Libertarians, and the Constitution Party, none of whom are able to make a dent in the fortress walls of the two-party system, and generally, history has shown these third parties to have life spans of about 16 years.

As a backdrop to this debate, ask yourself the question,’ If I was a member of either of the two major parties in America, and we’ve been handing back power between ourselves for many decades, would you welcome a third party? ‘ Of course not. So what do they do? First of all, they attempt to limit the number of money a third person can raise, since money is the life blood of politics. H. Ross Perot used his own limitless fortune and was only able to capture 18.9 % Of the vote. Some well-meaning, middle class guy cannot expect to raise substantial campaign funds from his thin Rolodex file of contributors. That money will normally go to either of the two major party candidates who’ve a chance of winning, and then repaying the ‘favor’ to the donor. In Perot’s case, he had no experienced national organization in place, so his money wasn’t used to its greatest effect.

One of the tricks used by the major party candidates is to appropriate the third party’s main campaign issues, leaving that campaign bare and shivering in the cold, with nothing much to talk about. That appears to be what the Republican Party is doing with the Tea Party. The conservative wing of the political party is enticing the Tea Party back to the republican base by publicly embracing some Tea Party positions. You do not want to beat them, you wanna have them join you, or rather, rejoin you, if you can.

In the early 1920 ‘s, the Labour Party passed the Liberal Party to become the main opposition to the Conservative Party, who’re the UK’s main political party on the ‘right’.

The Labour Party appeared from the labour movement and from the socialist political parties of the nineteenth century. It describes itself as a part of democratic socialism.

It was the first political party in the United Kingdom to fight for more rights and representation for the working class, and traditionally, it has been the working class that has given the base and traditional members for the Labour Party.

So what’s an outraged citizen to do to get noticed and perhaps make a meaningful modification of the way things are being run? Getting a bunch of like-minded people together and naming your group certainly hasn’t worked in the whole history of our country. Putting a label on your third party is like walking around in a NRA Convention with a target on your back and a $1 million prize for someone hitting the bullseye.

If third party people are truly only concerned with getting their policies implemented, and not with acquiring personal power and money, it would be much better to start at the community level, and working their way up to a presidential candidate, identify and support candidates who concur with the party’s basic principles and positions, no matter which major party they’re in. It is hard to know who to squash if a person has an acceptable party label on the outside, but a revolutionary turn of mind inside.

This requires a national organization. How do you create this? The Internet. This is the greatest wild card to ever come along in politics. Barack Obama’s campaign should be studied by anyone wanting to put together a successful third party, or getting acceptable candidates elected, despite party affiliations. He ran a campaign long on public affairs and short on substance, mostly organized and funded through the Internet. Do what he did, but put some meat on its bones, and you might come up a winner. But you better be bold.

One thing which is essential and must be considered before any first steps are taken to forming a meaningful third party, and that’s the recognition that what politics is all about is power and money, and it’s a ruthless game. Big power and big money, and to take that away from a person who has it firmly in hand, you’ll have to pry their bleeding fingers off the levers of control that are in their possession. It will get ugly, and isn’t for the faint of heart.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Post Navigation